'The manuscript records the contents of two volumes, each of at least about 200 pages, which had catalogued Trumbull’s ancient coins.
Catalogus Numismat: in primo volumine per Dom: Bonett ex Musaeo Revd Dom: Trumball.
Fol: 1 Nummi Regum et Illustrium Graecorum & Barbarorum 0083
Fol: 16 Reges Incerti 0003
Fol: 17 Nummi Populorum & Urbium 0129
Fol: 39 Nummus Samaraticus 0001
Fol: 39 Nummus Hebraicus 0001
Fol: 40 Nummus Phoenicius 0001
Fol: 40 Nummus Parthicus 0001
Fol: 40 Nummi Arabici 0002
Fol: 40 Nummi Carthaginiensium 0008
Fol: 42 Nummi Gothici 0002
Fol: 42 Nummi Incerti, Ignoti, Mutili 0048
Fol: 46 Nummi Imperatorum 0773
Fol: 191 Nummi Familiarum Romanrum 0035
Fol: 197 Nummi Romani Antiquissimi sine nomine Familiae 0003
1090
Finis Tomi Primi p' Dom: Bonett
N:B: Nummi Surei I'clus: 11:-
Medaglioni Inclus. 29:-
Catalogus Numismat: in secundo Volumine Ex Musaeo Revd: Dom: Trumball
Fol: 1 Nummi Regum et Illustrium Virorum 0126
Fol: 13 Num. Incerti, Regum, Illust: Virorum &c. 0004
Fol: 15 Nummi Populorum & Urbium 0240
Fol: 35 Num: Samaratici, Arabici, &c. 0014
Fol: 36 Nummi Incogniti 0076
Fol: 43 Num: Imperatorum Romrum 1919
Fol: 169 Nums Impris Constantinop: incognitus 0001
Fol: 171 Nummi Familiarum Romrum 021
Fol: 188 Num: Incerti & Ignoti Familm 0003
2594
N:B: Nummi Aurei Inclus: 12:-
Medaglioni Inclus. 66:-
Numer. Numismatm in Tomo Primo 1090
Numer: Numismatm in Tomo Scundo 2594
3684
It is not clear why the collection was divided into two volumes, as the headings repeat themselves. Perhaps they represent different periods of the collection? For example, if only the first volume was by Bonnet, then the second would represent later acquisitions.'
(Burnett 2020b, p. 1549)