The FINA wiki is currently being maintained. You can safely read all content, but please don't edit anything here!

Difference between revisions of "Hendrik Cannegieter - Jacques-Philippe d'Orville - 1731-8-30"

From Fina Wiki
(Created page with "{{Correspondence |Institution=Oxford, Bodleian Library |Inventory=MS D’Orville 495 fols. 9-14 |Author=Hendrik Cannegieter |Recipient=Jacques Philippe d';Orville |Corresponde...")
Line 3: Line 3:
|Inventory=MS D’Orville 495 fols. 9-14
|Inventory=MS D’Orville 495 fols. 9-14
|Author=Hendrik Cannegieter
|Author=Hendrik Cannegieter
|Recipient=Jacques Philippe d';Orville
|Recipient=Jacques Philippe d'Orville
|Correspondence date=1731/08/30
|Correspondence date=1731/08/30

Revision as of 08:08, 10 August 2019

Hendrik Cannegieter - Jacques-Philippe d'Orville - 1731-8-30
FINA IDUnique ID of the page  2243
InstitutionName of Institution. Oxford, Bodleian Library
InventoryInventory number. MS D’Orville 495 fols. 9-14
AuthorAuthor of the document. Hendrik Cannegieter
RecipientRecipient of the correspondence. Jacques Philippe d'Orville
Correspondence dateDate when the correspondence was written: day - month - year . August 30, 1731
PlacePlace of publication of the book, composition of the document or institution. Arnhem 52° 0' 20.38" N, 5° 52' 34.43" E
Associated personsNames of Persons who are mentioned in the annotation. Gisbert Cuper, Jean Bouhier
LiteratureReference to literature.
KeywordNumismatic Keywords 
LanguageLanguage of the correspondence
LinkLink to external information, e.g. Wikpedia
Loading map...
Grand documentOriginal passage from the "Grand document".

Lettre du 30 août 1731 (d’Arnhem): He describes how after leaving O’s. hospitable roof he went to Cleves where he found few antiquities of interest apart from an overrated statue, but was delighted with a wonderful collection of Roman antiquities, especially coins in the library of a consul of the towns, all found in the neighbourhood: and thence to Zutphen, where he saw many unusual and largely unknown statues, coins and other antique relics and brought away a catalogue which included a coin of Vitellius. Many of the stone monuments have been described by Cuper, surprisingly inaccurately as to interpretation. He sends O. the coin of Timoclea to convince him of its genuineness. He proceeds to expound his ideas on the coin of Vaballathus brought to his notice by Bouhier. The exposition is lengthy and most elaborately documented from out of the way sources. He refers again to the coin of Timocleon for O’s. opinion, and reviews the scope and character of the antiquities as Cleves district has to show. (Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS D’Orville 495 fols. 9-14).