Jean Bouhier - Jacques-Philippe d'Orville - 1730-3-2

From Fina Wiki
Revision as of 14:47, 25 August 2020 by FDeCallatay (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Jean Bouhier, Dijon

Jean Bouhier - Jacques-Philippe d'Orville - 1730-3-2
FINA IDUnique ID of the page  3677
InstitutionName of Institution. Oxford, Bodleian Library
InventoryInventory number. MS D'Orville 492 fols. 25-26
AuthorAuthor of the document. Jean Bouhier
RecipientRecipient of the correspondence. Jacques-Philippe d'Orville
Correspondence dateDate when the correspondence was written: day - month - year . March 2, 1730
PlacePlace of publication of the book, composition of the document or institution. Dijon 47° 19' 17.69" N, 5° 2' 29.29" E
Associated personsNames of Persons who are mentioned in the annotation. Jean Foy-Vaillant, Nicolaas Heinsius, Claude Saumaise, Pieter Burman, Frans van Oudendorp
LiteratureReference to literature.
KeywordNumismatic Keywords  Book
LanguageLanguage of the correspondence French
External LinkLink to external information, e.g. Wikpedia  http://emlo.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/profile/work/a486e7cd-7504-49ac-a0ba-3549de5b8078?sort=date-a&rows=50&let con=Vaillant&baseurl=/forms/advanced&start=27&type=advanced&numFound=43
Map
Loading map...
You can move or zoom the map to explore other correspondence!
Grand documentOriginal passage from the "Grand document".

EMLO: "[ [N. B. copy by an amanuensis his hands being rheumatic] ]His indispositions have delayed, but not for good, his life of Saumaise. A 2nd edition of his notes on "de Natura Deorum" and on book 1 of the Tusculans will soon be started at Paris. No answer yet to his enquiry as to the availability for purchase of the late Vaillant's works. He mentions Duckerus' Florus and Oudendorp's "Julian Obsequems" the books he is curious to have; as also Velleius Paterculus with N. Heinsius' last notes. He wishes Burmann would now give up the Virgil so long expected from N. Heinsius. He would be glad to contribute towards Wesselingius' edition of Antonine's journey, but has little to offer. He confirms the report about certain local officials (promotions and in embarrassed condition). Apropos of a conjecture on the 5th eclogue of Virgil he says he would enjoy diverting O. with further observations of the sort."