John Evelyn - 1684-12-03

Diaries

John Evelyn, 1684/12/03

John Evelyn - 1684-12-03

FINA IDUnique ID of the page ᵖ	13996
InstitutionName of Institution.
InventoryInventory number.
PlacePlace of publication of the book, composition of the document or institution.
AuthorAuthor of the document.	John Evelyn
Associated personsNames of Persons who are mentioned in the annotation.	Henri Justel, Ralph Sheldon, Henry Slingsby
Publication dateDate when the publication was issued: day - month - year .	December 3, 1684
KeywordNumismatic Keywords ᵖ	Coin Collection , Popes , Roman Imperial , Greek , Otho , Aemilianus , Coin Price
LiteratureReference to literature.	de Beer 1955, vol. IV pp. 396-71, Burnett 2020b, pp. 1205-62
LanguageLanguage of the correspondence	English
External LinkLink to external information, e.g. Wikpedia ᵖ

Export: CSV  RDF

Other entries for the same diary

Diary	Publication dateDate when the publication was issued: day - month - year .
John Evelyn - 1644-03-01	1 March 1644
John Evelyn - 1644-04-01	1 April 1644
John Evelyn - 1644-11-07	7 November 1644
John Evelyn - 1644-11-21	21 November 1644
John Evelyn - 1645-02-13	13 February 1645
John Evelyn - 1645-02-20	20 February 1645
John Evelyn - 1645-02-27	27 February 1645
John Evelyn - 1645-05-04	4 May 1645
John Evelyn - 1645-05-07	7 May 1645
John Evelyn - 1654-07-10	10 July 1654
John Evelyn - 1664-10-23	23 October 1664
John Evelyn - 1671-10-17	17 October 1671
John Evelyn - 1675-10-31	31 October 1675
John Evelyn - 1684-12-03	3 December 1684
John Evelyn - 1686-12-16	16 December 1686
John Evelyn - 1690-03-11	11 March 1690

Grand documentOriginal passage from the "Grand document".

I carried Mosieur Justell, & Slingsby Master of the Mint to see Mr. Sheldons collection of Medaills; the series of Popes was rare, & so was among the Moderns several, especially that of John Husses Martydome at Constance; of the Roman Emp: Consulars: some Greeke, &c both Coper, Gold, Sil: not many truly antient; a Medalion of Otho, P: Aemil: , &c, hardly antient. They were held a thousand pound price, but not worth I judge above 200 pound, (there being many not truly antique). [de Beer 1955, vol. IV pp. 396-7; Burnett 2020b, pp. 1205-6]